POSH Act Compliance in India: Practical Legal Guide for Employers and Employees (2026 Update)

As per The Economic Times, India’s top 30 blue-chip companies reported a 6.2% increase in sexual harassment complaints in FY25 compared to FY24. This rise not only indicates an increase in reported cases but also reflects growing employee confidence in reporting incidents, suggesting improved awareness and trust in redressal mechanisms.

Contrary to the belief that such incidents are limited to physical office spaces, sexual harassment is equally prevalent in remote work environments. A joint survey conducted in 2024 by the Southeast Asia Freedom of Expression Network (SAFEnet) and the Never Okay Project revealed that 88 out of 314 respondents reported experiencing sexual harassment while working from home. Notably, the banking and IT sectors, which have a high proportion of remote workers, recorded the highest increase in complaints.

More than a decade after its enactment, the relevance of the “Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 which is also know as POSH Act is unequivocal. The rising number of complaints clearly answers the question of its continued relevance with a resounding “yes.” The POSH Act is no longer a good-to-have HR policy, it is a mandatory legal obligation, a critical compliance requirement, and a significant reputational safeguard for organizations.

• 👉 If you’re an Employer: Jump to Compliance Checklist
• 👉 If you’re HR: Jump to ICC + Timelines
• 👉 If you’re a Woman Employee: Jump to Filing Process
• 👉 If you’re a Founder: Read Enforcement + Penalties

The Vishaka Guidelines (1997) were issued by the Supreme Court of India to address sexual harassment at the workplace when no specific law existed on the subject. They arose from the *Vishakha and Others v. State of Rajasthan* case.

Held: Sexual harassment at the workplace violates Articles 14, 15, 19(1)(g), and 21 of the Constitution.

Impact: Laid down binding Vishaka Guidelines, which later formed the foundation of the POSH Act, 2013.

To fill this legal gap, the Court laid down binding guidelines applicable to all employers, requiring prevention measures and a formal complaints mechanism, until Parliament enacted a dedicated law later realized through the POSH Act, 2013.

Why the POSH Act, 2013 Was Needed: Key Gaps in the Vishaka Guidelines (1997)

• The Vishaka Guidelines were judicial directions, not a parliamentary law, making enforcement weak and inconsistent.
• They provided broad principles but lacked detailed procedures, timelines, and accountability mechanisms.
• No penalties were prescribed for employer non-compliance, resulting in poor implementation.
• Coverage was largely limited to formal workplaces, excluding the unorganised sector, domestic workers, and informal employment.
• Definitions of sexual harassment and workplace were not exhaustive, leaving room for ambiguity.
• There was no structured inquiry process, time limits, or appeal mechanism.
• Employer responsibilities were general in nature, with no statutory obligation for training, reporting, or monitoring.
• Confidentiality and interim relief were not clearly enforceable.
• There was no institutional monitoring or reporting framework to track compliance.

Is your organisation legally safe in 2026? Detailed POSH Act Breakdown

1. What is POSH Act, 2013?

Under Section 2(n) of the POSH Act, 2013, sexual harassment includes any one or more of the following unwelcome acts or behaviour (whether directly or by implication):

• Physical contact and advances
• A demand or request for sexual favours
• Making sexually coloured remarks
• Showing pornography
• Any other unwelcome physical, verbal, or non-verbal conduct of a sexual nature

The key element is that the conduct must be unwelcome, making the woman feel uncomfortable, intimidated, or violated in the workplace.

POSH_Policy_Template_Detailed.pdf

Free template download button

2. Who is covered under POSH Act?

Domestic worker means a woman engaged in household work in any household for remuneration in cash or kind, whether employed directly or through an agency, on a temporary, permanent, part-time, or full-time basis. It excludes family members of the employer.

Employee means any person working at a workplace on a regular, temporary, ad hoc, or daily wage basis, whether employed directly or through an agent or contractor, with or without remuneration, and with or without the knowledge of the principal employer. It includes co-workers, contract workers, probationers, trainees, apprentices, or any person working under express or implied terms of employment.

3. What is a workplace?

• Any government, public sector, or government-funded department, organisation, office, branch, unit, or enterprise.
• Any private sector organisation, including companies, NGOs, trusts, societies, institutions, and service providers engaged in commercial, professional, educational, industrial, health, financial, or other activities.
• Hospitals and nursing homes.
• Sports institutes, stadiums, complexes, and venues, whether residential or non-residential.
• Any place visited by an employee in the course of employment, including employer-provided transportation.
• A dwelling place or house.
• Virtual spaces

The “unorganised sector” refers to enterprises owned by individuals or self-employed workers engaged in goods or services, employing fewer than ten workers, if any.

1. Timelines for Inquiry and Reporting

A. Filing of Complaint

• An aggrieved woman must file a written complaint of sexual harassment with the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) or Local Complaints Committee (LCC) within three months from the date of the incident.
• In cases involving a series of incidents, the complaint must be filed within three months from the date of the last incident.
• The ICC/LCC may extend the filing period by an additional three months if it records reasons in writing and is satisfied that circumstances prevented timely filing.
• If the woman is unable to submit the complaint in writing, the Committee is legally required to assist her in reducing it to writing.

B. Conciliation (Optional Pre-Inquiry Stage)

• Before initiating a formal inquiry, the ICC/LCC may attempt conciliation only at the request of the aggrieved woman.
• Monetary settlement is expressly prohibited as a basis of conciliation.
• If a settlement is reached:
  • The terms must be recorded in writing,
  • Copies must be given to both parties, and
  • The employer must implement the settlement.
• Once conciliation is concluded, no further inquiry is conducted, unless the terms of settlement are violated.

C. Commencement and Completion of Inquiry

• If conciliation is not requested or fails, the ICC/LCC must initiate a formal inquiry.
• The inquiry must be conducted in accordance with:
  • applicable service rules, or
  • prescribed procedure under the Act where service rules do not exist.
• The inquiry must be completed within 90 days from the date the complaint is received.
• Both parties must be:
  • given an opportunity to be heard, and
  • provided access to the findings of the Committee.

D. Interim Relief During Inquiry

• During the pendency of the inquiry, the ICC/LCC may recommend interim relief at the written request of the aggrieved woman, including:
  • transfer of either party,
  • grant of leave up to three months (in addition to regular leave), or
  • any other relief as prescribed.
• The employer is required to implement these recommendations immediately and report compliance to the Committee.

E. Submission of Inquiry Report

• Upon completion of the inquiry, the ICC/LCC must prepare a reasoned inquiry report.
• The report must be submitted to the employer or District Officer within 10 days of completion of the inquiry.
• Copies of the report must be provided to both the aggrieved woman and the respondent.

F. Action on Inquiry Report

• Where allegations are not proved, the Committee recommends no action.
• Where allegations are proved, the Committee may recommend:
  • disciplinary action as per service rules, and/or
  • monetary compensation to the aggrieved woman.
• The employer or District Officer must act on the recommendations within 60 days of receiving the inquiry report.

G. Appeal

• Any person aggrieved by:
  • the inquiry findings,
  • the recommendations, or
  • non-implementation of recommendations,
• may file an appeal within 90 days in accordance with applicable service rules or prescribed procedure.

1. Who is employer?

• In government departments, public sector bodies, or local authorities, the head of the department or unit, or any officer specifically authorised by the appropriate government.
• In private sector workplaces, any person responsible for the management, supervision, and control of the workplace, including those involved in policy formulation and administration.
• In workplaces covered above, the person who discharges contractual obligations towards employees.
• In a dwelling place or household, any person or household that employs or benefits from the services of a domestic worker, regardless of the number, duration, or nature of such employment.

1. Employer duties under section 19

• Ensure a workplace that is safe for women, including protection from persons coming into contact at the workplace.
• Display at conspicuous places:
  • The penal consequences of sexual harassment, and
  • The order constituting the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC).
• Conduct awareness and training programmes
  • Organise regular workshops and awareness programmes for employees on POSH provisions.
  • Conduct orientation programmes for ICC members as prescribed.
• Make available all necessary facilities to the Internal Committee or Local Committee for:
  • handling complaints, and
  • conducting inquiries.
• Help secure the attendance of the respondent and witnesses before the ICC/LCC.
• Make available any information, documents, or records required by the ICC/LCC in relation to the complaint.
• Provide assistance to the aggrieved woman if she chooses to file a complaint under the Indian Penal Code or any other applicable law.
• Where the respondent is not an employee, initiate action under criminal law at the workplace where the incident occurred, if the aggrieved woman so desires.
• Treat sexual harassment as a misconduct under service rules and initiate disciplinary action accordingly.
• Ensure timely submission of reports by the Internal Complaints Committee.

1. What is Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) and how it works?

A. When does the ICC apply?

• Every employer must constitute an Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) at each workplace where ten or more employees are employed.
• If an organisation has multiple offices, branches, or administrative units at different locations, a separate ICC must be constituted at each such unit.
• The ICC is the primary authority for receiving and inquiring into complaints of sexual harassment when the respondent is an employee of the organisation.

B. Constitution of the ICC

The ICC must be constituted by a written order of the employer and must include:

• A Presiding Officer, who must be a senior woman employee at the workplace (If unavailable, she may be nominated from another office or organisation of the same employer.)
• At least two employee members, preferably committed to the cause of women or having experience in social work or legal knowledge.
• One external member from an NGO or association committed to women’s causes, or a person familiar with issues of sexual harassment.
• At least 50% of the ICC members must be women.
• The tenure of ICC members cannot exceed three years.

ICC_Constitution_Format_Detailed.pdf

C. How does the ICC function?

D. Role of the employer in ICC functioning

• The employer must:
  • provide facilities and support to the ICC,
  • assist in securing attendance of parties and witnesses,
  • treat sexual harassment as misconduct, and
  • ensure timely submission of ICC reports.

1. What is a SHe-Box: How to use it and when it is helpful?

A. What is a SHe-Box

SHe-Box is a centralised, government-run online portal launched by the Ministry of Women and Child Development (MWCD) to enable women to:

• File complaints of sexual harassment at the workplace online, and
• Track the status of such complaints under the POSH Act, 2013.

It also functions as a national repository of information on:

• Internal Committees (ICs), and
• Local Committees (LCs)

constituted across government, private, and unorganised sectors

The portal is designed to strengthen implementation, monitoring, transparency, and accountability under the POSH framework.

B. How to Use the SHe-Box Portal

a. Filing a Complaint

• An aggrieved woman can submit her complaint online through the SHe-Box portal.
• The portal is user-friendly and includes multilingual support to improve accessibility across regions and social backgrounds.
• Complaints can be filed by women working in:
  • public sector,
  • private sector,
  • unorganised sector, and
  • domestic work FAQ-_SHe-Box_Portal.

b. Automatic Routing of Complaint

• Once submitted, the complaint is automatically forwarded to:
  • the Internal Committee (IC) of the organisation (if it has 10 or more employees), or
  • the Local Committee (LC) of the district (if the organisation has fewer than 10 employees or if the complaint is against the employer).
• This ensures that the complaint reaches the legally appropriate authority without procedural confusion

c. Tracking and Transparency

• The complainant can track the status of her complaint in real time.
• Updates on actions taken are visible to the complainant, ensuring transparency and accountability in the redressal process

d. Role of Nodal Officers

• Every workplace is required to designate a Nodal Officer for the portal.
• The Nodal Officer acts as a link between the employer, IC/LC, and the complainant, and is responsible for:
  • updating IC/LC details,
  • monitoring complaint progress,
  • uploading annual reports, and
  • updating information on awareness and training programmes

C. When is SHe-Box Helpful?

SHe-Box is particularly useful in the following situations:

a. Absence or Inaccessibility of ICC

• When a workplace:
  • has not constituted an Internal Committee, or
  • the woman is unable or hesitant to approach the IC directly.

b. Unorganised Sector & Domestic Workers

• Women working in the unorganised sector or as domestic workers can easily file complaints through SHe-Box.
• The portal directs such complaints to the appropriate Local Committee based on the location of the workplace.

c. Complaint Against the Employer

• Where the complaint is against the employer himself/herself, SHe-Box ensures routing to the Local Committee, avoiding conflict of interest.

d. Monitoring Delays & Non-Compliance

• The centralised system allows authorities to:
  • monitor delays,
  • track non-compliance by employers, and
  • ensure effective enforcement of the POSH Act .

e. Mandatory On-boarding of Workplaces

• As clarified in the documents, all workplaces including private entities are required to onboard the SHe-Box portal.
• Unless IC details are uploaded, complaints cannot be routed to that workplace, making onboarding essential for statutory compliance.

1. ICC vs SHe-Box: Which Route to Use and When?

Criteria	Internal Complaints Committee (ICC)	SHe-Box (Sexual Harassment electronic Box)
What it is	An internal statutory committee constituted by the employer under the POSH Act	A government-run online portal managed by the Ministry of Women & Child Development
Legal basis	POSH Act, 2013 (Sections 4–13)	POSH Act + MWCD initiative + DoPT notification
Where it applies	Workplaces with 10 or more employees	All workplaces – public, private, unorganised sector, domestic work
Who can use it	Women employees of that specific organisation	Any working woman, regardless of sector or size of workplace
Mode of filing	Internal submission (written complaint to ICC)	Online complaint filing through a central portal
Who conducts the inquiry	ICC of the organisation	Complaint is routed to ICC or Local Committee (LCC) automatically
Monitoring authority	Employer-led monitoring	Government-monitored system
Status tracking	Depends on internal process	Real-time status tracking available to complainant
When ICC exists and is functional	✅ Best and primary route	❌ Not necessary, but still optional
When ICC is not constituted	❌ Not available	✅ Best route – complaint routed to LCC
When complaint is against employer / top management	⚠️ Conflict of interest possible	✅ Preferred route – routed to LCC
Unorganised sector / domestic workers	❌ ICC not applicable	✅ Primary and effective route
Fear of retaliation or inaccessibility	⚠️ May discourage direct reporting	✅ Safer alternative due to central oversight
Transparency & accountability	Internal confidentiality	Higher accountability through government visibility
Employer obligation	Must constitute, support, and act on ICC recommendations	Must onboard on SHe-Box, appoint Nodal Officer, upload ICC details
Failure to comply	Attracts penalties under POSH Act	Non-onboarding leads to complaints being escalated externally

The POSH Act, 2013 adopts a broad and evolving definition of “workplace”, making it fully applicable to remote, hybrid, and digital work environments. Sexual harassment is not limited to physical office spaces and can occur wherever work-related interactions take place.

A. Work-from-Home (WFH)

Under the POSH Act, a “workplace” includes any place visited by an employee arising out of or during the course of employment, as well as a dwelling place or house. Accordingly, when employees work from home, their home becomes an extended workplace for POSH purposes. Any unwelcome conduct connected to work—by colleagues, managers, or clients can amount to workplace sexual harassment, even if it occurs outside office premises or office hours.

B. Video Calls and Virtual Meetings

Sexual harassment during video conferences or virtual meetings (such as inappropriate comments, gestures, exposure, or coercive behaviour) is covered under POSH. The absence of physical proximity does not dilute liability virtual presence linked to employment is sufficient to trigger the Act.

C. Digital Communication Platforms

POSH also applies to harassment through digital and electronic communication, including:

• WhatsApp and text messages
• Emails
• Slack, Microsoft Teams, or other collaboration tools
• Social media interactions connected to work

Unwelcome sexually coloured remarks, repeated personal messages, sharing of explicit content, or inappropriate emojis sent in a work-related context can constitute sexual harassment under Section 2(n) of the Act.

D. Judicial Interpretation of “Workplace”

Courts in India have consistently interpreted the term “workplace” broadly, recognising that modern work is not confined to physical offices. Judicial decisions have emphasised that the nature of the interaction and its connection to employment, rather than the physical location, is the determining factor.

This interpretation ensures that the POSH Act remains effective in digital, hybrid, and evolving work models, offering protection to women irrespective of where or how work is performed.

⚠️ Unsure whether your current ICC setup survives an audit? Get a confidential POSH compliance review for your organisation.

Button: Book Compliance Review

For several years after the enactment of the POSH Act, enforcement largely depended on self-certification by employers, with limited oversight by authorities. The recent judicial interventions and coordinated government action, however, mark a structural shift in how POSH compliance is monitored and enforced in India. Compliance is no longer viewed as an internal HR exercise, but as a regulatory obligation subject to audit, disclosure, and penalties.

Risk Level	Non-Compliance Example	Consequence
🔴 Critical	No ICC	₹50,000 fine + licence risk
🔴 Critical	ICC expired tenure	Inquiry invalid
🟠 High	No training	Audit remark
🟡 Moderate	Improper display	Technical violation

A. Government Audits and District-Wise Verification

Pursuant to the Supreme Court’s directions in Aureliano Fernandes v. State of Goa

Held: Labour departments across States and Union Territories have been instructed to carry out district-wise surveys and physical verification of establishments. These audits focus on:

• whether an Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) has been constituted,
• whether the composition of the ICC meets statutory requirements,
• whether the committee is functional rather than merely existing on paper, and
• whether employers are maintaining records, reports, and awareness measures under the Act.

Impact: Triggered district-wise compliance audits across India.

Unlike earlier compliance checks, these surveys are time-bound, documented, and reported through a structured administrative hierarchy, from District Labour Officers to State Chief Secretaries. This ensures that lapses are identified systematically, rather than only when individual complaints arise. Importantly, this audit mechanism transforms POSH compliance into a verifiable regulatory condition, similar to labour law inspections.

B. Elevation of POSH to Board-Level Governance

Another significant enforcement development is the movement of POSH compliance into the corporate governance framework. Companies are now required to make specific disclosures in their Board’s Report, including:

• confirmation of ICC constitution,
• number of sexual harassment complaints received during the year,
• number of complaints disposed of, and
• cases pending beyond statutory timelines.

By mandating disclosure at the board level, responsibility shifts from HR managers to directors and senior leadership, increasing accountability. False, incomplete, or misleading disclosures may expose companies to regulatory action, shareholder scrutiny, and governance risks. This integration also aligns POSH compliance with ESG and transparency norms, where workplace safety and inclusivity are increasingly assessed by investors and regulators.

C. Consequences of Non-Compliance: Legal, Financial, and Reputational

The enforcement framework is supported by clear statutory penalties under Section 26 of the POSH Act. Employers who fail to constitute an ICC, violate procedural requirements, or disregard statutory duties may face:

• monetary penalties up to ₹50,000 for initial non-compliance,
• enhanced penalties for repeat violations, and
• cancellation or non-renewal of licences, registrations, or approvals required to operate the establishment.

Beyond statutory fines, the consequences increasingly extend to reputational damage, particularly where non-compliance is recorded in government databases, board reports, or judicial proceedings. For corporates, adverse disclosures can impact brand value, employee trust, investor confidence, and ESG ratings. For smaller establishments, regulatory action may directly threaten business continuity.

Step 1: Drafting the Complaint

A complaint must be made in writing by the aggrieved woman. It should include:

• details of the incident(s),
• date, time, and place of occurrence,
• name(s) of the respondent(s), and
• any supporting documents, messages, emails, or witnesses (if available).

POSH_Complaint_Format_Detailed.pdf

Timeline:

• The complaint should be filed within 3 months from the date of the incident.
• In cases of continuing harassment, the limitation period starts from the last incident.
• The ICC or Local Committee may extend this period by another 3 months if sufficient cause is shown.

If the aggrieved woman is unable to write due to physical or mental incapacity, the Act permits assistance through a representative, relative, friend, co-worker, or legal heir (as applicable).

Step 2: Filing the Complaint with ICC or SHe-Box

• If the organisation has an ICC (mandatory where there are 10 or more employees), the complaint should be submitted to the Internal Complaints Committee.
• If there is no ICC, or if the complaint is against the employer, the complaint may be filed with the Local Committee or through the SHe-Box portal, which forwards it to the appropriate authority.

At this stage, the complainant may also request interim relief, such as:

• transfer of either party,
• leave for up to 3 months, or
• temporary change in reporting structure.

Step 3: Inquiry Process

Once the complaint is received, the ICC follows a quasi-judicial inquiry process:

• The respondent is provided a copy of the complaint and given an opportunity to submit a written response.
• Both parties are heard, evidence is examined, and witnesses may be called.
• Conciliation may be attempted only at the request of the complainant and without monetary settlement.
• If conciliation fails or is not requested, a formal inquiry is conducted.

The ICC is required to follow principles of natural justice, ensuring fairness, neutrality, and confidentiality.

Step 4: Timelines for Inquiry and Reporting

• The inquiry must be completed within 90 days.
• The ICC must submit its inquiry report within 10 days of completion.
• Copies of the report are provided to both the complainant and the respondent.
• The employer is required to act on the recommendations within 60 days.

Strict timelines ensure that complaints are not delayed or ignored.

Step 5: Outcome, Action, and Appeal

• If the allegations are proved, the ICC may recommend disciplinary action, deduction of compensation from salary, counselling, or other measures.
• If the complaint is not proved, the matter is closed with recorded reasons.
• Malicious complaints may attract action, but mere inability to prove allegations does not amount to malice.

Appeal:

Either party may file an appeal against the ICC’s decision before the appropriate authority or court within 90 days, as per service rules or applicable law.

What Happens After the Complaint Is Filed?

Once a complaint is filed:

• confidentiality must be strictly maintained,
• retaliation against the complainant or witnesses is prohibited,
• employers are legally bound to implement ICC recommendations, and
• failure to comply can attract penalties under Section 26 of the POSH Act.

It’s time to bust some myths on POSH Act

• If you believe POSH applies only to large organisations, you are already non-compliant. The law applies to every workplace, regardless of size, sector, or structure, and failure to activate the correct mechanism exposes you to statutory penalties.
• If your organisation has an anti-harassment policy but has not constituted a valid Internal Complaints Committee, you are exposed to enforcement action. A policy without a functioning ICC is treated as cosmetic compliance.
• If POSH training was conducted once during onboarding and never repeated, you are violating a continuing statutory duty. The law requires periodic sensitisation and regular ICC orientation, not one-time awareness.
• If you think only permanent employees are protected, you are excluding legally covered persons. The POSH Act protects contract workers, interns, trainees, volunteers, visitors, clients, and domestic workers.
• If you believe sexual harassment must involve physical contact, you are ignoring the most frequently prosecuted violations. Digital messages, remarks, gestures, threats, and hostile environments fall squarely within the law.
• If you assume work-from-home or virtual interactions fall outside POSH, you are operating under a legally outdated assumption. Emails, video calls, messaging platforms, and online meetings are recognised as workplaces when connected to employment.
• If complaints in your organisation are handled informally by HR without routing them to the ICC, you are bypassing a mandatory statutory process and risking invalidation of the entire inquiry.
• If you rely on anonymous complaints as formal POSH cases, you are misunderstanding procedural law. The Act mandates written complaints, and anonymous reports do not trigger statutory inquiry obligations.
• If you believe complaints can only be made against men, you are misreading the law. An aggrieved woman may file a complaint against any person, regardless of gender.
• If you are an MNC relying solely on global harassment policies, you are exposed to Indian regulatory action. Indian operations must independently comply with Indian POSH law, including ICC constitution.
• If you think HR professionals cannot be ICC members, you are unnecessarily limiting your compliance options. The law permits HR members, subject to statutory composition safeguards.
• If your ICC members have continued beyond three years without re-nomination, your committee itself may be invalid. Tenure limits are mandatory, not advisory.
• If conciliation is treated as a default or forced option, you are violating the complainant’s statutory rights. Conciliation is optional, complainant-initiated, and cannot involve monetary settlement.
• If ICC recommendations are treated as advisory or discretionary, you are in direct violation of the Act. Employers must implement them within 60 days.
• If your organisation skipped the annual POSH report because no complaints were filed, you are in reporting default. Annual reporting is mandatory irrespective of complaint volume.
• If you assume non-compliance only results in small fines, you are underestimating the risk. Penalties include financial sanctions, licence cancellation, regulatory scrutiny, and reputational damage.
• If POSH compliance is viewed merely as a legal checkbox, you are missing its governance and cultural implications. Non-compliance increasingly affects employee trust, brand value, and ESG assessment.

Get editable HR-ready templates + implementation notes. Download below 👇

POSH_Checklist_Large_Enterprises_Ready_to_Use.pdf

POSH_Checklist_Startups_Ready_to_Use.pdf

✅ 1. Is a legally valid ICC constituted at every unit with 10+ employees?

• Written constitution order issued?
• Presiding Officer is a senior woman employee?
• External member formally appointed?
• Minimum 50% women members?
• Separate ICC for each branch/location (if applicable)?

⚠ If “No” → This is immediate statutory non-compliance.

---

✅ 2. Is the ICC tenure valid?

• Are members within the 3-year tenure limit?
• Has re-nomination been formally documented?

⚠ Expired tenure may invalidate inquiries.

---

✅ 3. Are ICC details displayed conspicuously at the workplace?

• Penal consequences displayed?
• ICC composition displayed?
• Updated display after any change?

⚠ Often flagged in inspections.

---

✅ 4. Have periodic POSH awareness trainings been conducted?

• Annual or periodic sessions (not one-time onboarding)?
• Separate orientation for ICC members?
• Attendance records maintained?

⚠ One-time training = continuing violation.

---

✅ 5. Are inquiry timelines strictly followed?

• Complaint acknowledged?
• Inquiry completed within 90 days?
• Report issued within 10 days?
• Employer action within 60 days?

⚠ Timeline breaches are audit red flags.

---

✅ 6. Is confidentiality strictly maintained?

• No public disclosure of complainant identity?
• No circulation of inquiry details?
• HR not handling matters outside ICC?

⚠ Breach can attract legal consequences.

---

✅ 7. Is the organisation onboarded on the SHe-Box portal?

• ICC details uploaded?
• Nodal Officer appointed?
• Annual data updated?

(Portal administered by the Ministry of Women & Child Development)

⚠ Non-onboarding may escalate complaints externally.

---

✅ 8. Is the Annual POSH Report prepared and filed?

• Annual report submitted to District Officer?
• Board’s Report disclosure (if company)?
• Data consistency maintained?

⚠ Filing is mandatory even if zero complaints were received.

---

✅ 9. Are records properly documented?

• Complaint copies
• Inquiry proceedings
• Evidence records
• Final recommendations
• Action taken reports

⚠ Poor documentation weakens defensibility during audit.

---

✅ 10. Is POSH compliance reviewed at leadership/board level?

• Reported to senior management?
• Risk discussed at governance level?
• Included in ESG or compliance dashboards?

⚠ POSH is no longer only an HR responsibility.

---

How to Interpret Your Score

Score	Risk Level	What It Means
9–10 Yes	🟢 Low Risk	Structurally audit-ready
6–8 Yes	🟠 Moderate Risk	Vulnerable in inspection
3–5 Yes	🔴 High Risk	Likely non-compliant
0–2 Yes	🚨 Critical Exposure	Immediate corrective action required

Scored below 8? Request a compliance gap review.

Button: Book Compliance Review Call

Most POSH violations do not arise from intent, but from assumptions and assumptions are now the biggest compliance risk.

• ICC exists only on paper
• Expired external member
• No inquiry documentation
• Training done but undocumented
• annual report mismatch

Calculate Your POSH Risk Score

• ICC constituted?
• External member active?
• She-Box onboarded?
• Annual report filed?

We help companies build legally defensible POSH systems. Want a full compliance gap report? Leave your work email.

Product: POSH Compliance Risk Decoder for Employers/Founders (2026 Edition)

1. Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013
2. Supreme Court Judgment: Vishaka and Others v. State of Rajasthan (1997)
3. Supreme Court Judgment: Aureliano Fernandes v. State of Goa (2023)
4. Ministry of Women and Child Development – SHe-Box Portal Guidelines
5. Department of Personnel & Training (DoPT) POSH Office Memorandums